The U.S. Supreme Court turned down one appeal in a mass tort lawsuit today, but will hear oral arguments in another on Wednesday.The Court denied a Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed by several tobacco companies in hundreds of consolidated product liability and fraudulent concealment cases brought by individual smokers in West Virginia. The defendants sought review of the constitutionality of a trial plan that utilized a procedural vehicle known as “reverse bifurcation,” in which punitive damages issues are tried on a collective basis before any individual liability issues are determined. The defendants’ claimed that Supreme Court review was necessary because the West Virginia courts make the use of “reverse bifurcation” a common practice in mass tort litigation. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/25/AR2008022501016.htmlThe Court will hear arguments Wednesday on a class action arising out of the 1986 Exxon Valdez oil spill. At issue is whether the company should be required to pay all or part of a $2.5 billion punitive damages award handed down by a federal jury in Alaska in 1994 (the original verdict was for $5 billion but was later reduced to $2.5 billion by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals). The Anchorage Daily News has a good summary of the issues before the Court as well as a timeline of events and other related information. http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/326234.html
Supreme Court Considers Issues in Mass Action Lawsuits
March 28, 2008 by Paul Karlsgodt
Posted in Supreme Court Decisions | 3 Comments
3 Responses
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Subscribe by Email
Twitter Feed: @classaction
- It’s Not too Late to Sign up for Next Week’s CLE Webinar on Statistics in Class Actions bit.ly/KGpifs 1 day ago
- Finally, a Decision in the Groundbreaking Group Action Against Deutsche Telekom bit.ly/KAUrkr 2 days ago
- BH Class Action Blog Interview With Professor Mary Kay Kane (Part II) bit.ly/JOOXBg 2 days ago
-
Our Contributors
Baker Hostetler Links
Blogroll
- 3 Geeks and a Law Blog
- CAFALawBlog
- California Class Action Law
- Class Action Attorney Fee Digest Blawg
- Class Action Countermeasures
- Class Action Defense Blog
- Class Actions in Canada
- Classified: Carlton Fields Class Action Blog
- Dewey Cheatham & Howe Blog
- Drug and Device Law Blog
- Gabe’s Guide to the e-Discovery Universe
- How Appealing
- Jackson on Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts
- Mass Tort Litigation Blog
- NC Business Litigation Report
- New Jersey Appellate Law Blog
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- SCOTUS Blog
- Securities Docket
- Spam Notes
- The Complex Litigator
- The D&O Diary
- The Learned Lawyer
- The Race to the Bottom
- The UCL Practitioner
- Wage Law blog
- With Vigour and Zeal
Lawyers' Resources
Litigation Support
-
Recent Comments
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on Battleground TCPA
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on NYT Dealbook Blog: Explaining the Securities Class Action Downturn
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on Will AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion Really Kill the Consumer Class Action?
- Melissa on Will AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion Really Kill the Consumer Class Action?
- Good News: Inside Counsel Must Do More With Less on Class Actions : Class Action Countermeasures on Obtaining Early Resolution on the Merits in a Class Action May Be a Pyrrhic Victory
-
Recent Posts
- It’s Not too Late to Sign up for Next Week’s CLE Webinar on Statistics in Class Actions
- Finally, a Decision in the Groundbreaking Group Action Against Deutsche Telekom
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet?
- The Decline of Class Actions, in a Nutshell
- First Circuit Lays Down Ground Rules for Cy Pres Awards
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Posts by Date
Tags
arbitration AT&T Mobility blawg review blog review CAFA canada class action canadian class action class action class action blog class action CLE class action commentary Class Action Decisions Class Action Fairness Act Class Action News class action reform class action settlement Class Action Trends class arbitration class arbitration waiver class certification CLE program collateral estoppel collective action concepcion consumer class action cy pres daubert dukes employment class action european class action FAA foreign cubed frcp 23 international class action International Class Action Law rigorous analysis rule 23 scotus securities class action securities fraud Supreme Court tort reform transnational class action u.s. supreme court wal-mart“Like” Us On Facebook


[...] Action Watch was issued in late March 2008 and includes articles on seven topics including “reverse bifurcation“, Cy Pres settlements, FACTA truncation, scheme liability, and class action tolling. For [...]
[...] West Virginia, home of the novel “reverse-bifurcation” procedure (see earlier entries here and here) in mass tort litigation, ranks [...]
[...] event, like an airplane crash, toxic leak, or oil spill. A well-known example is the Exxon Valdez oil spill case. When numerous mass actions against the same defendant or group of defendants are filed in the [...]