<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veteran&#8217;s Administration &#8220;Class Action&#8221; Not a Class Action at All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classactionblawg.com/2008/04/21/veterans-adminstration-class-action-not-a-class-action-at-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/04/21/veterans-adminstration-class-action-not-a-class-action-at-all/</link>
	<description>class action news, commentary, and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Litigation Funding for Representative Shareholder Actions in India &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/04/21/veterans-adminstration-class-action-not-a-class-action-at-all/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Litigation Funding for Representative Shareholder Actions in India &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-1023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the article contemplates that an association would bring the action on behalf of its members.  Associational representation is a procedural that has been used in the U.S., but is far less common in securities litigation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the article contemplates that an association would bring the action on behalf of its members.  Associational representation is a procedural that has been used in the U.S., but is far less common in securities litigation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technically Speaking, You don&#8217;t &#8220;Join&#8221; a Class Action &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/04/21/veterans-adminstration-class-action-not-a-class-action-at-all/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Technically Speaking, You don&#8217;t &#8220;Join&#8221; a Class Action &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] common mistake addressed in a previous entry is the identification of some cases as &#8221;class actions&#8221; when they are in fact mass [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] common mistake addressed in a previous entry is the identification of some cases as &#8221;class actions&#8221; when they are in fact mass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the Case of Knights Templar v. the Pope a Class Action? &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/04/21/veterans-adminstration-class-action-not-a-class-action-at-all/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is the Case of Knights Templar v. the Pope a Class Action? &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of their members, similar to the similar to the associational standing doctrine that was applied in a recent case in the US against the Veteran&#8217;s Administration.  However, with at least one of the possible mechanisms for representative actions, there is a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of their members, similar to the similar to the associational standing doctrine that was applied in a recent case in the US against the Veteran&#8217;s Administration.  However, with at least one of the possible mechanisms for representative actions, there is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/04/21/veterans-adminstration-class-action-not-a-class-action-at-all/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (see my earlier commentary on characterizations of this case as a &#8220;class action&#8221; here and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (see my earlier commentary on characterizations of this case as a &#8220;class action&#8221; here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partial Glossary of Representative Actions and Terms &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/04/21/veterans-adminstration-class-action-not-a-class-action-at-all/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Partial Glossary of Representative Actions and Terms &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] trial against the United States Department of Veteran&#8217;s Affairs was never actually certified as a class action.  Instead, the case is being pursued by two nonprofit veterans&#8217; advocacy groups who are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] trial against the United States Department of Veteran&#8217;s Affairs was never actually certified as a class action.  Instead, the case is being pursued by two nonprofit veterans&#8217; advocacy groups who are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

