<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Class Certification for Meal and Rest Break Wage Loss Claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classactionblawg.com/2008/07/23/no-class-certification-for-meal-and-rest-break-wage-loss-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/07/23/no-class-certification-for-meal-and-rest-break-wage-loss-claims/</link>
	<description>class action news, commentary, and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/07/23/no-class-certification-for-meal-and-rest-break-wage-loss-claims/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Wage Law provides an update on an appeal to the California Supreme Court of the much-publicized wage and hour class action decision involving alleged unpaid wages for work during meal and rest breaks, Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2008) 165 Cal. App. 4th 25: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wage Law provides an update on an appeal to the California Supreme Court of the much-publicized wage and hour class action decision involving alleged unpaid wages for work during meal and rest breaks, Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2008) 165 Cal. App. 4th 25: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/07/23/no-class-certification-for-meal-and-rest-break-wage-loss-claims/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Complex Litigator reports that a petition for review has been filed in the highly publicized wage and hour class action decision by the California Court of Appeal in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Complex Litigator reports that a petition for review has been filed in the highly publicized wage and hour class action decision by the California Court of Appeal in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/07/23/no-class-certification-for-meal-and-rest-break-wage-loss-claims/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for meal and rest breaks in light of the California Court of Appeal&#8217;s recent decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2008 WL [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for meal and rest breaks in light of the California Court of Appeal&#8217;s recent decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2008 WL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/07/23/no-class-certification-for-meal-and-rest-break-wage-loss-claims/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in the wake of the California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Brinker (see link to summary here), see this entry from The Complex Litigator (citing entries from The UCL Practitioner and Alaska [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the wake of the California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Brinker (see link to summary here), see this entry from The Complex Litigator (citing entries from The UCL Practitioner and Alaska [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/07/23/no-class-certification-for-meal-and-rest-break-wage-loss-claims/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Wage Law Blog offers news on actions by the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement in response to the recent California Court of Appeal decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court.  (See ClassActionBlog entry here): [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wage Law Blog offers news on actions by the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement in response to the recent California Court of Appeal decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court.  (See ClassActionBlog entry here): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

