<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seventh Circuit: TILA Rescission Claims Are Not Suitable for Class Action Treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classactionblawg.com/2008/09/26/seventh-circuit-tila-rescission-claims-are-not-suitable-for-class-action-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/09/26/seventh-circuit-tila-rescission-claims-are-not-suitable-for-class-action-treatment/</link>
	<description>class action news, commentary, and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/09/26/seventh-circuit-tila-rescission-claims-are-not-suitable-for-class-action-treatment/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=487#comment-457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] For synopses of various cases addressing Truth in Lending Act (TILA) issues, including the viability of class actions for rescission of mortgages, see this entry from Foreclosure Combatant.  (Note that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned the decision in Andrews v. Chevy Chase Bank.  See this September 26 CAB Entry). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For synopses of various cases addressing Truth in Lending Act (TILA) issues, including the viability of class actions for rescission of mortgages, see this entry from Foreclosure Combatant.  (Note that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned the decision in Andrews v. Chevy Chase Bank.  See this September 26 CAB Entry). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2008/09/26/seventh-circuit-tila-rescission-claims-are-not-suitable-for-class-action-treatment/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=487#comment-424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Indiana Blog, How Appealing, and Corporate Legal Times, are among the many legal blogs that commented on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals&#8217; decision disallowing a class action claim for rescission of a mortgage under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) (See CAB entry here): [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Indiana Blog, How Appealing, and Corporate Legal Times, are among the many legal blogs that commented on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals&#8217; decision disallowing a class action claim for rescission of a mortgage under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) (See CAB entry here): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

