Comments on: Colorado Supreme Court Rejects “Fraud on the Market” Theory in Consumer Insurance Class Action

By: What Fraud Claims Make for a Good Class Action? Justice Breyer has an Idea. « ClassActionBlawg.com

Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:58:05 +0000

[...] The “fraud on the market” theory has been rejected in other contexts. (See, e.g. CAB entry dated April 27, 2009.) However, one seemingly off-the-wall hypothetical from Justice Breyer helps to illustrate the [...]

By: Supreme Court Adds a Fourth Class Action Case to its Docket « ClassActionBlawg.com

Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:19:42 +0000

[...] on the market” theory of reliance in consumer fraud cases. (See these CAB entries dated April 27, 2009 and February 24, [...]

By: Practice Tip: Should a Defendant Challenge Certification Early and Often? « ClassActionBlawg.com

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:45:53 +0000

[...] are necessary to justify the motion. In Colorado, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Benzing, 206 P.3d 812 (Colo. 2009) addresses this [...]

By: Another Common Reliance Theory Fails in Colorado « ClassActionBlawg.com

Another Common Reliance Theory Fails in Colorado « ClassActionBlawg.com — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:37:03 +0000

[...] 12, 2009 by Paul Karlsgodt In April, the Colorado Supreme Court decided Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Benzing, 206 P.3d 812 (Colo. 2009), in which it rejected the “fraud on the market” theory of [...]