Subscribe by Email
Twitter Feed: @classaction
- “What Would King Solomon Do?” or “Justice Is No Joke” http://bit.ly/8X6GtD 3 days ago
- NERA Economic Consulting Issues Report on Securities Class Actions in Canada http://bit.ly/99ZyOe 1 week ago
- Class Action No Longer a Pain in the Neck for Alberta Chiropractors http://bit.ly/du1y3L 1 week ago
-
Recent Comments
- Jerry Alden on What Does It Mean When a Federal Appeals Court Denies Appeal of a Class Certification Order?
- Paul Karlsgodt on What Should We Do With Unclaimed Class Action Funds, Pres Tell?
- Burton Haynes on Journal Record: Oklahoma Appeals Court Bars Multiple Class Action Suits by Members of the Same Class
- guesDiesy on NFL Football and Class Actions, a Mix as Good as Chocolate and Peanut Butter?
- Cert Granted in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. « ClassActionBlawg.com on Second Circuit Unwilling to Reject “Foreign Cubed” Class Actions Categorically
-
Recent Posts
- “What Would King Solomon Do?” or “Justice Is No Joke”
- NERA Economic Consulting Issues Report on Securities Class Actions in Canada
- Class Action No Longer a Pain in the Neck for Alberta Chiropractors
- More on In re Baycol Products Litigation
- Eighth Circuit Upholds Federal Injunction of Putative State Court Class Action
Baker Hostetler Links
Blogroll
- 3 Geeks and a Law Blog
- CAFALawBlog
- Class Action Attorney Fee Digest Blawg
- Class Action Countermeasures
- Class Action Defense Blog
- Class Actions in Canada
- Classified: Carlton Fields Class Action Blog
- Dewey Cheatham & Howe Blog
- Drug and Device Law Blog
- Gabe’s Guide to the e-Discovery Universe
- How Appealing
- Jackson on Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts
- Mass Tort Litigation Blog
- NC Business Litigation Report
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- SCOTUS Blog
- Securities Docket
- Spam Notes
- The Complex Litigator
- The D&O Diary
- The Learned Lawyer
- The Race to the Bottom
- The UCL Practitioner
- Wage Law blog
- With Vigour and Zeal
Lawyers' Resources
Litigation Support
Archives
-
Our Contributors
Posts by Date
Tags
attorneys fees blawg review blog review CAFA canada class action canadian class action canadian class action law chinese class action claims made settlement class action class action appeal class action blog class action blogs class action CLE class action commentary Class Action Decisions Class Action Fairness Act Class Action News class action reform class action review class action settlement Class Action Trends class arbitration waiver class certification collateral estoppel collective action colorado bar association consumer class action cy pres european class action FACTA federalist society foreign cubed international class action International Class Action Law res judicata rule 23 securities class action securities fraud subprime class action Supreme Court tort reform transnational class action UK class action UK collective action

In Case You Care, ClassActionBlawg Has Just Rented the Video “Class Action” Starring Gene Hackman
October 26, 2009 by Paul Karlsgodt
Venkat Balasubramani over at Spam Notes has been covering developments in an interesting group of class actions against Blockbuster Video and Facebook. The cases arise out of Facebook’s Beacon feature, which causes news feed stories to be automatically generated about users’ purchases and other actions with online partners like Blockbuster. the plaintiffs in each of the cases allege violations of various privacy laws arising out of the use of the Beacon program.
The first of the three actions was filed against Blockbuster in federal court in Texas. A separate filing against Facebook and various of its online partners, including Blockbuster, followed in federal court in California. The Texas plaintiffs later filed a similar case against Facebook in Texas.
The parties in the California case recently reached a settlement. The settlement calls for Facebook to terminate the Beacon program and pay $9.5 million to a fund to be used to establish a “privacy foundation,” along with payment of administrative costs, incentive payments to the named plaintiffs, and attorneys’ fees. If finally approved, the settlement would include a release of claims by users against both Facebook and its affiliates, thus ostensibly resolving the claims in both Texas cases even though Facebook is the only named defendant in the California case.
As Balasubramani reports, the court in the California case has preliminarily approved the settlement and denied attempts by the Texas plaintiffs to intervene. The cases involve an interesting case study in the struggle between competing plaintiff groups. The settlement also raises interesting questions about the use of cy pres awards to charity in lieu of direct payments to class members and the preclusive effect of a class settlement as to claims against defendants who do not contribute to the settlement consideration.
Check out Spam Notes for the latest developments as well as links to key filings and settlement documents.
Posted in Class Action News, Class Action Trends, Commentary | Tagged beacon, beacon settlement, blockbuster, cy pres, facebook, facebook settlement, privacy class action, privacy law | No Comments Yet
Comments RSS