The Supreme Court recently issued a decision addressing the issue of class arbitration. In Stolt-Nielson S.A. v. Animalfeeds International Corp., No. 08-1198 (April 27, 2010), an antitrust class action involving allegations of illegal price-fixing by international shipping companies, the Court held that an arbitration panel’s decision to force class arbitration was invalid because the arbitration agreement was silent about whether arbitration could proceed [...]
Archive for May, 2010
Class Arbitration as a Global Class Action Forum? Supreme Court Says No.
Posted in Class Action News, International Class Action Law, Supreme Court Decisions, tagged class arbitration, FAA, federal arbitration act, global class action, International Class Action Law, Supreme Court on May 11, 2010 | 1 Comment »
Strategies for Pursuing Appellate Review under FRCP 23(f), Or Not, Part Deux
Posted in Uncategorized on May 11, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
Strafford Publications is scheduling an encore presentation of the riveting CLE teleconference: Rule 23(f) Class Certification Appeals Strategies for Pursuing or Opposing Appellate Review in the Absence of Clear Standards This program was first presented in January 2009, and apparently folks liked it enough to justify a reprise. Check back here over the next few weeks for more [...]
NERA Economic Consulting Reports on Securities Class Action Trends in Australia
Posted in Class Action Trends, International Class Action Law, tagged australia class action, australian class action, Class Action Trends, International Class Action Law, NERA, securities class action on May 6, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
NERA Economic Consulting has published its first study on trends in securities class actions in Australia. The study covers a variety of topics, including numbers of filings, industries targeted, and settlement amounts. However, what I found to be of particular interest is the study’s focus on the impact of private litigation funding.
Recent Trends in Federal Class Certification Standards
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Class Action Trends, Federal Civil Procedure, rule 23, tagged american honda motor, class certification, class certification standard, class certification trends, daubert, dukes v. wal-mart, eisen, expert testimony, frcp 23, in re ipo, regression analysis, rigorous analysis, rule 23, statistical evidence on May 4, 2010 | 1 Comment »
I’m embarrassingly late in reporting on them, but I would be remiss if I did not mention two key recent United States Circuit Courts of Appeals decisions addressing the legal standards governing class certification under FRCP 23: In American Honda Motor Co. v. Allen, No. 09-8051 (7th Cir., April 7, 2010) the Seventh Circuit held that a district court abused [...]
Subscribe by Email
Twitter Feed: @classaction
- Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide http://t.co/ZBOfBUnp 2 days ago
- Demanding More from Outside Counsel http://t.co/yCNtmNrG 3 days ago
- Netherlands Court Reaffirms Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Approving Collective Settlement http://t.co/n4tBMpyU 1 week ago
-
Our Contributors
-
Recent Comments
- Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide « ClassActionBlawg.com on Looking for a Primer on Drug and Device Products Liability Litigation? Look No Further.
- Page not found « ClassActionBlawg.com on Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session 6 – Paths to (Mass) Justice
- Hetty on Presentation Materials for Tomorrow’s Webinar on Class Action Objectors
- Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session 6 – Paths to (Mass) Justice « ClassActionBlawg.com on Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session 5 – Who Has Jurisdiction in a Global Market?
- Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session 6 – Paths to (Mass) Justice « ClassActionBlawg.com on Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session 4 – Giving Away Money
-
Recent Posts
- Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide
- Netherlands Court Reaffirms Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Approving Collective Settlement
- Demanding More from Outside Counsel
- Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session 6 – Paths to (Mass) Justice
- Presentation Materials for Tomorrow’s Webinar on Class Action Objectors
Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Posts by Date
-
-
Tags
“Like” Us On Facebook
Paul Karlsgodt
Raj Chohan
CAB Staff
Elena Kagan and Class Actions
Posted in Class Action News, tagged across-the-board, class action commentary, elena kagan, falcon, kagan, sotomayor, u.s. supreme court, unity of interest on May 18, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
When the Supreme Court nomination of then-Judge Sonia Sotomayor was announced, I put together this summary of her fairly significant judicial record on class action issues. Finding any record on class action issues for current nominee Elena Kagan has been more of a challenge, since she has not served as a judge. However, Solicitor General Kagan does have a background [...]
Read Full Post »