• Home
  • About Us
  • Comments Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • googlec8681f12577de830
  • Who’s Reading?

ClassActionBlawg.com

class action news, commentary, and analysis

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Comments Policy

ClassActionBlawg.com encourages conversation about our content and welcomes your thoughts.  Please be respectful of other readers, however.  We will continue to allow comments to most entries unless they are abused.  

Keep in mind that this site is not intended to be a message board or a forum for general discussion.  In particular, comments that are obscene, sexual in nature, racist, defamatory, or irrelevant to the discussion will be removed.   ClassActionBlawg.com administrators have sole discretion to decide which comments are inappropriate. 

Do not post confidential information or requests for legal advice in the comments section.  ClassActionBlawg.com is not intended as a place to seek legal advice.  It is also a public forum, so posting confidential information risks revealing that information to the entire Internet.  Requests for legal advice or comments seeking legal representation in a pending or potential lawsuit will not be approved.

Generally speaking, if you have any questions about whether a comment is appropriate, it probably isn’t. 

ClassActionBlawg.com does not endorse or express any opinion about comments that appear on this site.  Registered WordPress users may have the ability to post comments without moderation.  To the extent that inappropriate comments are posted without moderation, they will be removed as soon as they are discovered.  Most comments will be moderated as carefully as time and circumstances permit before they are approved.  Please be patient if your comments do not appear right away after they are posted.  If you see comments on this site that you believe are inappropriate under the above guidelines, please feel free to contact us.  Comments will either be approved or disapproved in their entirety.  They will not be edited by the moderator.

If you are new to the world of blog comments, see this helpful Q&A from the New York Times regarding its blog comments policy.  The same guiding principles apply here.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Comments Off

  • Subscribe by Email

    Sign Up Here to Receive Daily Updates by Email
  • Twitter Feed: @classaction

    • The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class A... http://t.co/Bz0sUcCz 2 days ago
    • Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief http://t.co/2kO3oBOG 5 days ago
    • Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide http://t.co/ZBOfBUnp 1 week ago
  • Our Contributors

    • Paul Karlsgodt
      • The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers
      • Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief
      • Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide
    • Raj Chohan
      • Cert Granted in Walmart v. Dukes
      • AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion – summary of oral argument
      • Eleventh Circuit Takes a Mulligan on Cappuccitti
    • CAB Staff
      • Class Action Blogosphere Periodic Review
  • Baker Hostetler Links

    • Baker Hostetler Main Page
    • China-U.S. Trade Law Blog
    • Class Action Defense Team
    • Employment Class Action Blog
    • Hospitality Lawg
  • Blogroll

    • 3 Geeks and a Law Blog
    • CAFALawBlog
    • California Class Action Law
    • Class Action Attorney Fee Digest Blawg
    • Class Action Countermeasures
    • Class Action Defense Blog
    • Class Actions in Canada
    • Classified: Carlton Fields Class Action Blog
    • Dewey Cheatham & Howe Blog
    • Drug and Device Law Blog
    • Gabe’s Guide to the e-Discovery Universe
    • How Appealing
    • Jackson on Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts
    • Mass Tort Litigation Blog
    • NC Business Litigation Report
    • New Jersey Appellate Law Blog
    • Overlawyered
    • Point of Law
    • SCOTUS Blog
    • Securities Docket
    • Spam Notes
    • The Complex Litigator
    • The D&O Diary
    • The Learned Lawyer
    • The Race to the Bottom
    • The UCL Practitioner
    • Wage Law blog
    • With Vigour and Zeal
  • Lawyers' Resources

    • AAA Class Arbitrations Page
    • ABA CADS Webpage
    • CBA Class Action Subsection Page
    • Federal Judicial Center
    • LLRX.com Class Action Resources
    • Stanford Law School Global Class Actions Exchange
    • Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse
  • Litigation Support

    • Class Action Administration, Inc.
    • Epiq Systems
    • Garden City Group
    • Hilsoft Notifications
    • Kinsella Media
    • Kurtzman Carson Consultants
    • Levick Strategic Communications
    • Metric Media
    • Rust Consulting
  • Recent Comments

    • The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers « ClassActionBlawg.com on Second Circuit Deals Another Blow to Class Arbitration Waivers
    • The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers « ClassActionBlawg.com on Second Circuit Deals Another Blow to Class Arbitration Waivers
    • The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers « ClassActionBlawg.com on Pennsylviana Federal Court Says Objective Standard Governs Willfulness Analysis under FACTA
    • European roundup on Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session II – Who’s Paying?
    • Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief « ClassActionBlawg.com on Thoughts on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
  • Recent Posts

    • The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers
    • Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief
    • Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide
    • Netherlands Court Reaffirms Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Approving Collective Settlement
    • Demanding More from Outside Counsel
  • Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
  • Posts by Date

    February 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    272829  
  •  Feedburner Feed

  • Blog Directory - Blogged
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Tags

    arbitration AT&T Mobility blawg review blog review CAFA canada class action canadian class action class action class action blog class action CLE class action commentary Class Action Decisions Class Action Fairness Act Class Action News class action reform class action settlement Class Action Trends class arbitration class arbitration waiver class certification CLE program collateral estoppel collective action concepcion consumer class action cy pres dukes employment class action european class action FAA FACTA foreign cubed frcp 23 international class action International Class Action Law rigorous analysis rule 23 scotus securities class action securities fraud Supreme Court tort reform transnational class action u.s. supreme court wal-mart
  • “Like” Us On Facebook

    ClassActionBlawg

    Promote Your Page Too

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.