<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classactionblawg.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classactionblawg.com</link>
	<description>class action news, commentary, and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 Class Action Year in Review by Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Class Action Judgments and Settlements in European Civil Law Countries &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2010/12/31/2010-class-action-year-in-review/#comment-4292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Class Action Judgments and Settlements in European Civil Law Countries &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=1445#comment-4292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in international or transnational class action litigation.  Even when it is permitted (see this CAB entry discussing the Supreme Court&#8217;s Morrison v. Australia National Bank decision addressing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in international or transnational class action litigation.  Even when it is permitted (see this CAB entry discussing the Supreme Court&#8217;s Morrison v. Australia National Bank decision addressing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8230; More on Amex III by Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog &#8211; Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2012/02/07/more-on-amex-iii/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog &#8211; Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=2088#comment-4290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the impacts, both on employment cases and otherwise, of the Second Circuit&#8217;s recent Amex III [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the impacts, both on employment cases and otherwise, of the Second Circuit&#8217;s recent Amex III [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8230; More on Amex III by Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog &#8211; Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2012/02/07/more-on-amex-iii/#comment-4289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog &#8211; Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=2088#comment-4289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Comments        &#171; &#8230; More on Amex&#160;III [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments        &laquo; &#8230; More on Amex&nbsp;III [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers by &#8230; More on Amex III &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2012/02/02/the-third-circuit-clarifies-the-facts-about-facta-while-the-second-circuit-has-a-different-concepcion-of-class-arbitration-waivers/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8230; More on Amex III &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=2082#comment-4284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Comments        &#171; The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcio... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments        &laquo; The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcio&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Second Circuit Deals Another Blow to Class Arbitration Waivers by The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2011/03/09/second-circuit-deals-another-blow-to-class-arbitration-waivers/#comment-4271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=1551#comment-4271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (2010), only to be reaffirmed by the Second Circuit in a March 8, 2011 ruling (discussed in this March 9, 2011 CAB entry).  In yesterday&#8217;s decision, the Second Circuit relied on the federal law of arbitrability, a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (2010), only to be reaffirmed by the Second Circuit in a March 8, 2011 ruling (discussed in this March 9, 2011 CAB entry).  In yesterday&#8217;s decision, the Second Circuit relied on the federal law of arbitrability, a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Second Circuit Deals Another Blow to Class Arbitration Waivers by The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2011/03/09/second-circuit-deals-another-blow-to-class-arbitration-waivers/#comment-4270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=1551#comment-4270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (2010), only to be reaffirmed by the Second Circuit in a March 8, 2011 ruling (discussed in this March 9, 2011 CAB entry).  In yesterday&#8217;s decision, the Second Circuit relied on the federal law of arbitrability, a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (2010), only to be reaffirmed by the Second Circuit in a March 8, 2011 ruling (discussed in this March 9, 2011 CAB entry).  In yesterday&#8217;s decision, the Second Circuit relied on the federal law of arbitrability, a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pennsylviana Federal Court Says Objective Standard Governs Willfulness Analysis under FACTA by The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2011/02/14/pennsylviana-federal-court-says-objective-standard-governs-willfulness-analysis-under-facta/#comment-4269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=1511#comment-4269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Jan. 24, 2012).  The Third Circuit affirmed a lower court&#8217;s decision (summarized in this February 14, 2011 CAB Post) holding that 1) the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) prohibits a merchant from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jan. 24, 2012).  The Third Circuit affirmed a lower court&#8217;s decision (summarized in this February 14, 2011 CAB Post) holding that 1) the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) prohibits a merchant from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session II – Who’s Paying? by European roundup</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2011/12/17/notes-from-the-5th-annual-conference-on-the-globalization-of-class-actions-and-mass-litigation-session-ii-whos-paying/#comment-4267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[European roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=1998#comment-4267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] from conference on globalization of class actions [Karlsgodt] Related: Adam [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from conference on globalization of class actions [Karlsgodt] Related: Adam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes by Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2011/06/20/thoughts-on-wal-mart-stores-inc-v-dukes/#comment-4259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classactionblawg.com/?p=1679#comment-4259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] context.  First, it offers an analysis of the potential application of various aspects of the Wal-mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes decision outside of the employment discrimination context, including the arguably heightened [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] context.  First, it offers an analysis of the potential application of various aspects of the Wal-mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes decision outside of the employment discrimination context, including the arguably heightened [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking for a Primer on Drug and Device Products Liability Litigation?  Look No Further. by Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy &#8211; An Indispensible Practice Guide &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com</title>
		<link>http://classactionblawg.com/2011/12/01/looking-for-a-primer-on-drug-and-device-products-liability-litigation-look-no-further/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy &#8211; An Indispensible Practice Guide &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://classactionblawg.wordpress.com/?p=1845#comment-4241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] December, I posted this preview of the then forthcoming book, Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy, by Mark [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December, I posted this preview of the then forthcoming book, Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy, by Mark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
