Having been focused on several other speaking and writing projects recently (in addition to my day job), it’s taken longer than I had hoped to comment on several recent class-action-related decisions by the federal circuit courts of appeals. Here’s a brief summary of three recent decisions of note: Washington State v. Chimei Innolux Corp., No. 11-16862 [...]
Posts Tagged ‘CAFA’
Roundup of Recent Federal Court of Appeals Decisions on Class Action Issues
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Class Action Fairness Act, Federal Court Decisions, tagged amount in controversy, CAFA, chimei, circuit court of appeals, cy pres, easterbrook, federal court of appeals, fifth circuit, fourth circuit, keeling, klier, ninth circuit, parens patriae, punitive damages, remand, removal, seventh circuit on October 4, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
If at First You Don’t Succeed, Try, Try Again
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Class Action Fairness Act, Supreme Court Decisions, tagged anti-injunction act, CAFA, claim preclusion, collateral estoppel, frcp 23, home state, issue preclusion, kagan, local controversy, relitigation exception, rule 23, scotus, smith v. bayer, Supreme Court, u.s. supreme court, west virginia on June 16, 2011 | 2 Comments »
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its third of four class action-related decisions for the October 2010 term. In Smith v. Bayer Corp., No. 09-1205, the Court held that a federal court exceeded its authority when it issued an injunction preventing a state court from considering whether to certify a class on claims in which [...]
Fourth Circuit Holds that CAFA Does Not Apply to State Parens Patriae Action
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Class Action Fairness Act, tagged 1332, 1446, CAFA, Class Action Fairness Act, diversity jurisdiction, mcgraw, parens patriae, removal, west virginia on May 23, 2011 | 3 Comments »
One of the more significant issues relating to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) that has percolating through the federal courts over the past few years is whether parens patriae actions brought by state attorneys’ general seeking to recover damages for their citizens are “class actions” that can be removed to federal court. On Friday, [...]
DirectBuy Settlement Rejected
Posted in Federal Court Decisions, Class Action Decisions, Class Action Fairness Act, Class Action Settlements, tagged CAFA, class action settlement, coupon settlement, fairness hearing, directbuy, attorney general, substantive fairness, procedural fairness, class action settlement approval, janet c. hall, district of connecticut, ags, attorneys general, class action objectors on May 16, 2011 | 3 Comments »
United States District Court Judge Janet C. Hall issued an order today rejecting the proposed settlement in Wilson v. DirectBuy, Inc., No. 3:09-CV-590 (JCH) (D. Conn. May 16, 2011) (Here is a link to the slip opinion). The controversial settlement had been opposed by 39 attorneys general, a nonprofit consumer rights organization, and had been singled [...]
Don’t Miss the CAFA Removal and Remand Developments Seminar, March 29, 2011
Posted in CAFA Requirements, Class Action Trends, CLE Programs, tagged 28 U.S.C. 1332, 28 U.S.C. 1441, amount in controversy, CAFA, CAFA removal, cappuccitti, Class Action Fairness Act, CLE program, diversity jurisdiction, eleventh circuit, removal, strafford publications on February 24, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
I will be speaking in an upcoming live phone/web seminar on CAFA removal issues sponsored by Strafford Publications. Here is some information about the program: CAFA Removal and Remand: Latest Developments Tuesday, March 29, 1:00pm-2:30pm EDT Program Description: Jurisdictional ambiguities in the CAFA statute continue to challenge litigators. One example is the Eleventh Circuit’s Cappuccitti [...]
A Breach of Contract Doesn’t Equal Fraud, and Other Observations
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Consumer Class Actions, Federal Court Decisions, tagged aftermarket parts, avery, breach of contract, CAFA, Class Action Fairness Act, consumer class action, consumer fraud, federal jurisdiction, fiduciary, fraud, geico, greenberger, insurance class action on January 11, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Two colleagues separately sent me a copy of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision yesterday in Greenberger v. GEICO General Insurance Co., slip op., No. 09-1603 (7th Cir., Jan. 10, 2011) (Sykes, J.), so I thought it was worthy of a summary. Greenberger involved would-be class action claims against an insurer for the alleged practice of not [...]
2010 Class Action Year in Review
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Class Action Fairness Act, Federal Court Decisions, Supreme Court Decisions, Uncategorized, tagged 23(b)(2), all writs act, baycol, CAFA, CAFA removal, civil rights class action, class action review, Class Action Trends, class arbitration, class arbitration waiver, discrimination class action, diversity jurisdiction, dukes, FAA, foreign cubed, morrison, nerve center, preemption, rigorous analysis, shady grove, stolt-nielsen, top ten lists, wal-mart, year in review on December 31, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
As 2010 winds down, it’s time to review the key developments in class action law. It was an especially busy year for the federal courts, and in particular the U.S. Supreme Court, on issues impacting class action practice. Here, in chronological order, are 10 key developments from the year that was: January 5 – In In [...]
Eleventh Circuit Takes a Mulligan on Cappuccitti
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Class Action Fairness Act, Federal Court Decisions, tagged amount in controversy, CAFA, capppuccitti, Class Action Fairness Act, diversity jurisdiction, eleventh circuit on October 20, 2010 | 1 Comment »
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed itself just months after its widely reviled opinion in Cappuccitti v. DirecTV. In a per curiam opinion issued October 15, 2010, a three judge panel concluded, on rehearing, that the earlier Cappuccitti decision was simply “incorrect.” The key holding means that a plaintiffs’ class under CAFA does not [...]
Colorado Class Action Filing Trends
Posted in Class Action Trends, Colorado Civil Procedure, Colorado Class Action News, tagged CAFA, class action statistics, colorado class action, colorado class action filings, colorado class action statistics, colorado class action trends, removal on October 15, 2010 | 2 Comments »
I must have more readers than I thought, and some quality readers at that! Andrew Oh-Willeke, Denver lawyer and author of the blog Wash Park Prophet, posted this question as a comment to one of my recent posts, and it seemed like a great topic deserving of its own post: Do you know of any [...]
Subscribe by Email
Twitter Feed: @classaction
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class A... http://t.co/Bz0sUcCz 2 days ago
- Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief http://t.co/2kO3oBOG 5 days ago
- Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide http://t.co/ZBOfBUnp 1 week ago
-
Our Contributors
-
Paul Karlsgodt
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers
- Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief
- Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide
-
Raj Chohan
-
CAB Staff
-
-
Recent Comments
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers « ClassActionBlawg.com on Second Circuit Deals Another Blow to Class Arbitration Waivers
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers « ClassActionBlawg.com on Second Circuit Deals Another Blow to Class Arbitration Waivers
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers « ClassActionBlawg.com on Pennsylviana Federal Court Says Objective Standard Governs Willfulness Analysis under FACTA
- European roundup on Notes from the 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation, Session II – Who’s Paying?
- Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief « ClassActionBlawg.com on Thoughts on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
-
Recent Posts
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers
- Dukes, Medical Monitoring, and the Distinction Between Equitable and Injunctive Relief
- Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy – An Indispensible Practice Guide
- Netherlands Court Reaffirms Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Approving Collective Settlement
- Demanding More from Outside Counsel
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Posts by Date
-
-
Tags
“Like” Us On Facebook
When 36 AGs Object to Your Class Action Settlement, That’s Not a Good Sign
Posted in Class Action News, CAFA Requirements, Commentary, tagged parens patriae, CAFA, coupon settlement, class action notice, appropriate government official, amicus brief, directbuy, amicus, attorney general on April 12, 2011 | 5 Comments »
Rita Robinson, who writes the Boomer Consumer blog for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, posted an entry titled Attorneys general oppose DirectBuy’s class-action lawsuit settlement discussing an amicus brief filed by Attorneys General from 34 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia objecting to a proposed settlement in a consumer fraud class action brought against online wholesale club DirectBuy, Inc. in the U.S. [...]
Read Full Post »