The Colorado Supreme Court’s highly anticipated rulings in four class actions were announced earlier today. Here are links to the opinions. I’ll have more commentary on the four decisions soon: No. 09SC668 – Jackson v. Unocal Corp. – Judgment Reversed (class certification upheld) - Addresses the burden of proof on class certification. No. 09SC1080 – Garcia v. [...]
Posts Tagged ‘colorado supreme court’
Colorado Supreme Court Issues Four Decisions Addressing Class Action Issues
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Class Action News, Class Action Trends, Colorado Civil Procedure, Colorado Class Action News, tagged asbestos, bp america, burden of proof, causation, class cert, class certification, class-wide proof, colorado supreme court, common evidence, common proof, crcp 23, garcia, jackson, medved, patterson, preponderance, reliance, reyher, rigorous analysis, rule 23, state farm, unocal on October 31, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Audio for Colorado Supreme Court Arguments on Class Actions Available
Posted in Class Action News, Colorado Class Action News, rule 23, tagged causation, colorado class action, colorado supreme court, consumer fraud, garcia, medved, patterson, pb america, presumed reliance, reliance on March 1, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
The audio feeds for the arguments in three of the four class-action related cases heard today by the Colorado Supreme Court are now available on the court’s website. Here are some links: 09SC1080 Garcia v. Medved 10SC214 BP America v. Patterson 10SC77 – State Farm v Reyher
Colorado Supreme Court to Hear Oral Argument in Four Class Action Cases
Posted in Class Action News, Colorado Civil Procedure, Colorado Class Action News, tagged c.r.c.p. 23, class certification, class certification standard, colorado class action, colorado rules of civil procedure, colorado supreme court, common proof, crcp 23, daubert, fraud on the market, presume reliance, presumed reliance, presumption of reliance, rigorous analysis, schrek on February 28, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Matt Masich of Law Week Colorado has a good article out today previewing oral arguments scheduled for tomorrow in four class-action related cases. The outcome of these cases could have a dramatic effect on class action practice in the state. The issues to be considered include the proper standard for reviewing class certification, the burden of proof on class certificeation, the [...]
Colorado Supreme Court Hears Argument in “Fraud on the Market” Consumer Class Action
Posted in Class Action News, Class Action Trends, Colorado Class Action News, tagged benzing, class certification, colorado consumer protection act, colorado supreme court, consumer fraud, consumer protection, fraud on the market, presumption of reliance, price inflation, pritchard, reliance on December 3, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
The Colorado Supreme Court held oral argument today in the case of Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Benzing, No. 07SC483. Audio of the argument is now available at the Colorado Supreme Court’s website. Among the issues in the case is whether the “fraud on the market” theory, and other presumptions of reliance recognized in securities cases, applied [...]
Subscribe by Email
Twitter Feed: @classaction
- More Perspectives on Trends in Class Arbitration Waivers a Year After Concepcion bit.ly/LjFGTu 2 days ago
- California Supreme Court to Weigh in on Statistical Sampling bit.ly/KKBau8 5 days ago
- It’s Not too Late to Sign up for Next Week’s CLE Webinar on Statistics in Class Actions bit.ly/KGpifs 1 week ago
-
Our Contributors
-
Recent Comments
- More Perspectives on Trends in Class Arbitration Waivers a Year After Concepcion « ClassActionBlawg.com on Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet?
- California Supreme Court to Weigh in on Statistical Sampling « ClassActionBlawg.com on Trial By Formula, Statistical Sampling, and the Right to Due Process
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on Battleground TCPA
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on NYT Dealbook Blog: Explaining the Securities Class Action Downturn
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on Will AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion Really Kill the Consumer Class Action?
-
Recent Posts
- More Perspectives on Trends in Class Arbitration Waivers a Year After Concepcion
- California Supreme Court to Weigh in on Statistical Sampling in Class Actions
- It’s Not too Late to Sign up for Next Week’s CLE Webinar on Statistics in Class Actions
- Finally, a Decision in the Groundbreaking Group Action Against Deutsche Telekom
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet?
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Posts by Date
-
-
Tags
“Like” Us On Facebook
Paul Karlsgodt
Raj Chohan
CAB Staff
Jackson v. Unocal – Class Actions Find a Welcome Home in Colorado
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Class Action Trends, Colorado Civil Procedure, Colorado Class Action News, Commentary, tagged bp america, class action, class certification, colorado, colorado supreme court, conditional certification, crcp 23, decertification, dukes, frcp 23, garcia, jackson, medved, patterson, reyher, rigorous analysis, rule 23, state farm, unocal, wal-mart on November 2, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Ever since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decisions in Smith v. Bayer and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, I have wondered aloud whether we would start to see a significant divergence between the standards applicable to class certification in the state and federal courts. (See the Parting Thoughts Section of this August 31 SCOTUSBlog Post). My home state [...]
Read Full Post »