Just when we were starting to think that 2011 might mark the end of the great American class action… Today, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision reversing a denial of class certification in the securities class action Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403, slip op (June 6, 2011). In the opinion, authored by [...]
Posts Tagged ‘presumption of reliance’
2010-11 U.S. Supreme Court Class Action Tally: Defendants 1, Plaintiffs 1
Posted in rule 23, Securities Class Actions, Supreme Court Decisions, tagged erica p. john, fifth circuit, fraud on the market, frcp 23, preponderance, presumption of reliance, rule 23, securities class action, securities fraud on June 6, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Colorado Supreme Court to Hear Oral Argument in Four Class Action Cases
Posted in Class Action News, Colorado Civil Procedure, Colorado Class Action News, tagged c.r.c.p. 23, class certification, class certification standard, colorado class action, colorado rules of civil procedure, colorado supreme court, common proof, crcp 23, daubert, fraud on the market, presume reliance, presumed reliance, presumption of reliance, rigorous analysis, schrek on February 28, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Matt Masich of Law Week Colorado has a good article out today previewing oral arguments scheduled for tomorrow in four class-action related cases. The outcome of these cases could have a dramatic effect on class action practice in the state. The issues to be considered include the proper standard for reviewing class certification, the burden of proof on class certificeation, the [...]
Colorado Supreme Court Rejects “Fraud on the Market” Theory in Consumer Insurance Class Action
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Colorado Class Action News, Consumer Class Actions, tagged affiliated ute, consumer class action, fraud on the market, loss causation, presumed reliance, presumption of reliance, price inflation, securities class action on April 27, 2009 | 4 Comments »
The Colorado Supreme Court issued one of its most significant class action decisions in recent years today in Farmers Ins. Exch. v. Benzing, No. 07SC483 (Colo., April 27, 2009), rejecting the so-called “fraud on the market” theory of reliance and loss causation in an insurance class action. Justice Bender authored the decision on behalf of [...]
Colorado Supreme Court Hears Argument in “Fraud on the Market” Consumer Class Action
Posted in Class Action News, Class Action Trends, Colorado Class Action News, tagged benzing, class certification, colorado consumer protection act, colorado supreme court, consumer fraud, consumer protection, fraud on the market, presumption of reliance, price inflation, pritchard, reliance on December 3, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
The Colorado Supreme Court held oral argument today in the case of Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Benzing, No. 07SC483. Audio of the argument is now available at the Colorado Supreme Court’s website. Among the issues in the case is whether the “fraud on the market” theory, and other presumptions of reliance recognized in securities cases, applied [...]
Subscribe by Email
Twitter Feed: @classaction
- Please Excuse the Silence http://t.co/5W6sDX9G 5 days ago
- Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Class Action Judgments and Settlements in European Civil Law Countries http://t.co/HaFz8NEi 1 week ago
- Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News http://t.co/G2h0tGLe 2 weeks ago
-
Our Contributors
-
Recent Comments
- Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Class Action Judgments and Settlements in European Civil Law Countries « ClassActionBlawg.com on 2010 Class Action Year in Review
- Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News « ClassActionBlawg.com on … More on Amex III
- Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News « ClassActionBlawg.com on … More on Amex III
- … More on Amex III « ClassActionBlawg.com on The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers « ClassActionBlawg.com on Second Circuit Deals Another Blow to Class Arbitration Waivers
-
Recent Posts
- Please Excuse the Silence
- Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Class Action Judgments and Settlements in European Civil Law Countries
- Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News
- … More on Amex III
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Posts by Date
-
-
Tags
“Like” Us On Facebook
Paul Karlsgodt
Raj Chohan
CAB Staff
What Fraud Claims Make for a Good Class Action? Justice Breyer has an Idea.
Posted in Commentary, Securities Class Actions, Supreme Court Decisions, tagged breyer, erica p. john fund, fraud, fraud on the market, halliburton, oral argument, presumed reliance, presumption of reliance, reliance, scotus, securities fraud, Supreme Court on April 25, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in the case of Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403. A transcript of the argument is now available on the Court’s website. Erica P. John Fund involves the appropriate standard for assessing class certification in securities fraud cases brought under the “fraud [...]
Read Full Post »