As reported by Yuma, AZ CBS affiliate KSWT TV, the Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion today holding that denials of class certification are not subject to interlocutory appeal under the state’s regular appeals procedure. A slip copy of the decision is available at the court’s website: Garza v. Swift Transportation Co., No. CV-08-0382-PR (Ariz., August [...]
Posts Tagged ‘rule 23(f)’
Arizona Supreme Court Says No to Interlocutory Class Certification Appeals
Posted in Class Action Decisions, tagged arizona class action, arizona supreme court, class action appeal, class certification appeal, federal rules of civil procedure, interlocutory appeal, interlocutory class certification appeal, rule 23(f) on August 24, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
Register Now for the Most Exciting CLE Program on Rule 23(f) Appeals Ever
Posted in CLE Programs, rule 23, tagged class action appeal, CLE program, frcp 23, frcp 23(f), rule 23, rule 23(f) on January 6, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
If you’re looking for a fun-filled way to spend a Tuesday lunch hour and need CLE credits, check out Strafford Publications’ upcoming CLE Teleconference Rule 23(f) Class Certification Appeals: Strategies for Pursuing or Opposing Appellate Review in the Absence of Clear Standards. The fun will begin on January 20, 2009 at 1PM Eastern. For more information [...]
Subscribe by Email
Twitter Feed: @classaction
- Please Excuse the Silence http://t.co/5W6sDX9G 5 days ago
- Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Class Action Judgments and Settlements in European Civil Law Countries http://t.co/HaFz8NEi 1 week ago
- Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News http://t.co/G2h0tGLe 1 week ago
-
Our Contributors
-
Recent Comments
- Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Class Action Judgments and Settlements in European Civil Law Countries « ClassActionBlawg.com on 2010 Class Action Year in Review
- Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News « ClassActionBlawg.com on … More on Amex III
- Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News « ClassActionBlawg.com on … More on Amex III
- … More on Amex III « ClassActionBlawg.com on The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers « ClassActionBlawg.com on Second Circuit Deals Another Blow to Class Arbitration Waivers
-
Recent Posts
- Please Excuse the Silence
- Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Class Action Judgments and Settlements in European Civil Law Countries
- Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News
- … More on Amex III
- The Third Circuit Clarifies the Facts About FACTA While the Second Circuit Has a Different Concepcion of Class Arbitration Waivers
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Posts by Date
-
-
Tags
“Like” Us On Facebook
Paul Karlsgodt
Raj Chohan
CAB Staff
Practice Tip: Should a Defendant Challenge Certification Early and Often?
Posted in Commentary, Practice Tips, rule 23, Uncategorized, tagged benzing, class certification, decertification, frcp 12, frcp 23, halftime motion, motion for judgment n.o.v., motion to strike class allegations, reconsider, reconsideration, rule 12(b)(6), rule 12(f), rule 23(c)(4), rule 23(f), trial plan on October 28, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
This article is about defending against class certification based on illogical, circular arguments in support of an oversimplified “one-size-fits all” legal theory based on an amalgam of facts that don’t describe any one class member’s actual experience. (In other words, many defense lawyers would say, it’s about what you face in all class actions.) Most class action defense lawyers are aware of numerous procedural devices that [...]
Read Full Post »