The Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog is constantly putting out quality content, but they have two new recent posts that I would especially recommend to my readers. They include: This February 6 post from John Lewis discussing the impacts, both on employment cases and otherwise, of the Second Circuit’s recent Amex III decision. This February [...]
Posts Tagged ‘scalia’
Baker Hostetler Employment Class Action Blog – Much More than Quality Employment Class Actions News
Posted in Class Action Trends, Federal Civil Procedure, Federal Court Decisions, Lawyers' Resources, Other class action blogs, tagged american express merchants, amex III, arbitration, class action, compucredit, concepcion, employment class action, FAA, federal arbitration act, federal common law, federal statutory law, greenwood, iqbal, lewis, mersol, pleading, rule 8, scalia, twombly, unconscionability on February 9, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
Concepcion Point/Counterpoint
Posted in Class Action Trends, Commentary, Consumer Class Actions, tagged arbitration, arbitration waiver, AT&T Mobility, class action abuse, class action lawyer, class arbitration waiver, concepcion, consumer class action, corporate greed, defense lawyer, entrepreneurial litigation, plaintiffs' lawyer, scalia, trial lawyer on May 26, 2011 | 2 Comments »
In response yesterday’s entry discussing Daniel Fisher’s article on the potential impacts of Concepcion, I got one of the best comments that I’ve ever received on this site. It comes from Portland complex injury and consumer class action attorney David Sugerman, who blogs at www.davidsugerman.com. Of course, I disagree with just about every word of it, but with imagery like a bunch [...]
Will AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion Really Kill the Consumer Class Action?
Posted in Commentary, Consumer Class Actions, Practice Tips, Supreme Court Decisions, tagged arbitration, AT&T Mobility, class arbitration, class arbitration waiver, class waiver, concepcion, consumer class action, scalia, Supreme Court on May 25, 2011 | 8 Comments »
Daniel Fisher, who writes the Full Disclosure blog at Forbes.com, posted an article last Friday titled Has Scalia Killed the Class Action? Fisher’s article one of the best I’ve seen in discussing the potential practical impact that the Supreme Court’s recent class arbitration waiver decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion may have on future consumer class action litigation. I highly recommend it. [...]
NY Times vs. Forbes: Is Concepcion a Blow to Consumer Rights or to Trial Lawyers’ Pocketbooks?
Posted in Class Action News, class action reform, Class Action Trends, Supreme Court Decisions, tagged arbitration, arbitration clause, AT&T Mobility, breyer, class arbitration, class arbitration waiver, concepcion, consumer class action, consumer rights, scalia on May 13, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Two op-eds published today highlight the philosophical debate over the impact of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion. The first, published by the New York Times, argues that the decision is a “devastating blow to consumer rights” because it makes it practically impossible for many consumers to seek vindication of their [...]
Supreme Court Finds in Favor of Class Arbitration Waivers
Posted in Supreme Court Decisions, tagged arbitration waiver, class arbitration waiver, concepcion, FAA, scalia, Supreme Court on April 27, 2011 |
In the first of four highly anticipated rulings on class action issues this term, the United States Supreme Court has handed down a major victory for business interests. In a 5-4 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, No. 09-893, the conservative majority held that the Federal Arbitration Act pre-empts state contract law principles in determining the [...]
Wal-Mart v. Dukes Oral Argument Transcript
Posted in Class Action News, Employment Class Actions, Supreme Court Decisions, tagged back pay, commonality, dukes, employment discrimination, ginsburg, injunctive relief, kagan, oral argument, predominance, rule 23(b)(2), scalia, sotomayor, Supreme Court, typicality, wal-mart on March 29, 2011 | 1 Comment »
The Wal-Mart v. Dukes argument was held as scheduled today. Here is a Wal-Mart v. Dukes Oral Argument Transcript. Some initial observations: The beginning of the defendant’s argument was focused on the proper standard for reviewing whether the plaintiff had sufficiently common evidence of a uniform policy. It was not until later in the defendant’s [...]
AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion – summary of oral argument
Posted in Class Action News, Supreme Court Decisions, Uncategorized, tagged alito, AT&T Mobility, class action waiver, class arbitration waiver, concepcion, FAA, ginsburg, kagen, pincus, scalia, supreme court scotus on November 17, 2010 | 3 Comments »
The Supreme Court heard argument last week in the case that many commentators were calling a possible death knell for consumer class actions. (See previous CAB posts on Nov. 4, 2010 and Nov. 9, 2010) So does the future of consumer class actions still seem dire after oral argument? The basic issue is whether the [...]
The United States Supreme Court and Class Actions
Posted in Supreme Court Decisions, tagged CAFA, class action jurisprudence, federalism, preemption, scalia, scotus, shady grove, sotomayor, u.s. supreme court on April 8, 2010 | 1 Comment »
I’m embarrassingly late in posting a link to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., No. 08-1008, slip op. (S. Ct., March 31, 2010) in which the Court held that a New York state rule prohibiting class actions to recover statutory penalties did not apply in a case filed [...]
Subscribe by Email
Twitter Feed: @classaction
- More Perspectives on Trends in Class Arbitration Waivers a Year After Concepcion bit.ly/LjFGTu 2 days ago
- California Supreme Court to Weigh in on Statistical Sampling bit.ly/KKBau8 5 days ago
- It’s Not too Late to Sign up for Next Week’s CLE Webinar on Statistics in Class Actions bit.ly/KGpifs 1 week ago
-
Our Contributors
-
Recent Comments
- More Perspectives on Trends in Class Arbitration Waivers a Year After Concepcion « ClassActionBlawg.com on Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet?
- California Supreme Court to Weigh in on Statistical Sampling « ClassActionBlawg.com on Trial By Formula, Statistical Sampling, and the Right to Due Process
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on Battleground TCPA
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on NYT Dealbook Blog: Explaining the Securities Class Action Downturn
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet? « ClassActionBlawg.com on Will AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion Really Kill the Consumer Class Action?
-
Recent Posts
- More Perspectives on Trends in Class Arbitration Waivers a Year After Concepcion
- California Supreme Court to Weigh in on Statistical Sampling in Class Actions
- It’s Not too Late to Sign up for Next Week’s CLE Webinar on Statistics in Class Actions
- Finally, a Decision in the Groundbreaking Group Action Against Deutsche Telekom
- Concepcion a Year Later, Are Consumer Class Actions Dead Yet?
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Posts by Date
-
-
Tags
“Like” Us On Facebook
Paul Karlsgodt
Raj Chohan
CAB Staff
Thoughts on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
Posted in Class Action Decisions, Commentary, Employment Class Actions, Federal Civil Procedure, Supreme Court Decisions, tagged adverse impact, class certification, daubert, dukes, employment class action, expert witness, ginsburg, rigorous analysis, rule 23, scalia, statistical evidence, statistical proof, Supreme Court, wal-mart on June 20, 2011 | 5 Comments »
Many commentators correctly that the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes would be favorable to business interests. However, unlike the Court’s earlier decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, the decision does not necessarily threaten to sound a death knell for class actions or even a particular category of class actions. Instead, the decision merely clarifies the standards on which future class actions are to [...]
Read Full Post »