• Home
  • About Us
  • Comments Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • googlec8681f12577de830
  • Who’s Reading?

ClassActionBlawg.com

class action news, commentary, and analysis

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« What Fraud Claims Make for a Good Class Action? Justice Breyer has an Idea.
Setting the Record Straight on Class Action Claims Aggregators »

Supreme Court Finds in Favor of Class Arbitration Waivers

April 27, 2011 by Paul Karlsgodt

In the first of four highly anticipated rulings on class action issues this term, the United States Supreme Court has handed down a major victory for business interests.  In a 5-4 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, No. 09-893, the conservative majority held that the Federal Arbitration Act pre-empts state contract law principles in determining the enforceability of a class arbitration waiver–an arbitration agreement that expressly precludes arbitration on behalf of a class.  Here is a link to the slip opinion.  Prior opinions issued by many state courts have found class arbitration waivers unconscionable and have allowed class actions despite the existence of an express agreement in consumer contracts barring them. 

Importantly, Justice Scalia’s majority opinion goes beyond even the question originally presented for review, which was whether the FAA pre-empts state law “when when [class action] procedures are not necessary to ensure that the parties to the arbitration agreement are able to vindicate their claims.”  Instead, the majority’s decision appears to hold that the FAA preempts state law (and possibly even removes “unconscionability” as a basis for invalidating an arbitration clause even when not based on state public policy) even when the lack of a class action mechanism as a practical matter leaves plaintiffs with no remedy at all.

Justice Thomas’s concurring opinion gives a ray of hope to consumer interests seeking to pursue class action litigation in cases where a class arbitration waiver exists.  Justice Thomas agreed that the FAA preempts state decisions on whether an arbitration clause is unconscionable, but he notes that this decision does not necessarily preclude an argument that no agreement existed in the first instance, such as where the agreement is found to have been entered into as a result of coercion or fraud.  However, although he concedes that unconscionability rising to the level of a complete lack of mutual assent would be a basis to decline to enforce an arbitration agreement, he appears to conclude that unconscionability based purely on public policy would never be a basis to invalidate an arbitration agreement under Section 2 of the FAA, since it would not impact the formation of the arbitration agreement.  See Slip Op. at 4, n.* (Thomas, J., concurring).   So, if there is a ray of hope for plaintiffs, it appears to be a small one.

One big issue left unresolved after the Court’s decision is whether federal courts still have the power to declare class arbitration waivers invalid as a matter of substantive federal law.  For example, in In re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, No. 06-1871-cv, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed its decision invalidating a class arbitration waiver after an earlier decision was vacated by the Court to reconsider in light Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 130 S. Ct. 1758 (2010).  In doing so, the court evaluated the validity of a class arbitration waiver “under the federal substantive law of arbitrability,” not under state law contract principles.  See also Gay v. CreditInform, 511 F.3d 369 (3d Cir. 2007); Kristian v. Comcast Corp., 446 F.3d 25, 63 (1st Cir. 2006).  This analysis would not clearly be affected by the holding of the Supreme Court’s decision today, although the tone of the majority’s opinion would seem to call the invalidation of any class arbitration waiver provision into question.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Supreme Court Decisions | Tagged arbitration waiver, class arbitration waiver, concepcion, FAA, scalia, Supreme Court |

  • Subscribe by Email

    Sign Up Here to Receive Daily Updates by Email
  • Twitter Feed: @classaction

    • Looks like Trump is finally getting his huge crowds. 2 months ago
    • It’s Not Too Late – Register Now for the 6th Annual ABA Regional CLE on Class Actions and Mass Torts classactionblawg.com/2019/06/18/its… 1 year ago
    • Videos from Haifa Class Action Conference Now Available on YouTube! classactionblawg.com/2019/05/08/vid… 1 year ago
  • Baker Hostetler Links

    • Baker Hostetler Main Page
    • China-U.S. Trade Law Blog
    • Class Action Defense Team
    • Class Action Lawsuit Defense Blog
    • Employment Class Action Blog
    • Hospitality Lawg
  • Blogroll

    • 3 Geeks and a Law Blog
    • CAFALawBlog
    • California Class Action Law
    • Class Action Attorney Fee Digest Blawg
    • Class Action Countermeasures
    • Class Action Defense Blog
    • Class Actions in Canada
    • Classified: Carlton Fields Class Action Blog
    • Consumer Law & Policy Blog
    • Dewey Cheatham & Howe Blog
    • Drug and Device Law Blog
    • Gabe’s Guide to the e-Discovery Universe
    • How Appealing
    • Jackson on Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts
    • Mass Tort Litigation Blog
    • NC Business Litigation Report
    • New Jersey Appellate Law Blog
    • Overlawyered
    • Point of Law
    • Renner on Class Actions
    • SCOTUS Blog
    • Securities Docket
    • Spam Notes
    • The Complex Litigator
    • The D&O Diary
    • The Learned Lawyer
    • The Race to the Bottom
    • The UCL Practitioner
    • Wage Law blog
    • With Vigour and Zeal
  • Lawyers' Resources

    • AAA Class Arbitrations Page
    • ABA CADS Webpage
    • CBA Class Action Subsection Page
    • Federal Judicial Center
    • LLRX.com Class Action Resources
    • Stanford Law School Global Class Actions Exchange
    • Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse
  • Litigation Support

    • Class Action Administration, Inc.
    • Epiq Systems
    • Garden City Group
    • Hilsoft Notifications
    • Kinsella Media
    • Kurtzman Carson Consultants
    • Levick Strategic Communications
    • Metric Media
    • Rust Consulting
  • Recent Comments

    • Newsfeeds and Notice – How Social Networks Might Affect Class Action Litigation | Class Action Lawsuit Defense on Big Changes to Rule 23 in 2018? Be Sure to Weigh In Now.
    • An Excellent Summary of Important Class Action Decisions During the Past Year — Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog on 2010 Class Action Year in Review
    • Blogging About Blogging - Drug & Device Law on In Defense of the BigLaw Blog
    • Supreme Court and constitutional law roundup - Overlawyered on Supreme Court Declines to Create Sweeping Rules Limiting Use of Statistics in Class Actions, But Offers Some Helpful Standards
    • Blogging About Blogging - Drug and Device Law on In Defense of the BigLaw Blog
  • Recent Posts

    • It’s Not Too Late – Register Now for the 6th Annual ABA Regional CLE on Class Actions and Mass Torts
    • Videos from Haifa Class Action Conference Now Available on YouTube!
    • Register Now for the Sixth Annual ABA Regional Program on Class Actions and Mass Torts, June 21 in San Francisco
    • Haifa Highlights, Part 3
    • ABA CADS Committee Offering Free Roundtable Program on Litigation Funding
  • Archives

    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • June 2018
    • January 2018
    • July 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • September 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
  • Posts by Date

    April 2011
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  
    « Mar   May »
  •  Feedburner Feed

  • Blog Directory - Blogged
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • 23(b)(2) ABA antitrust arbitration AT&T Mobility Baker Hostetler behrend blawg review blog review cads CAFA canada class action canadian class action class action class action blog class action CLE class action commentary Class Action Decisions Class Action Fairness Act Class Action News class action notice class action reform class action settlement Class Action Trends class action waiver class arbitration class arbitration waiver class certification cle CLE program collateral estoppel collective action comcast commonality concepcion consumer class action cy pres data breach data privacy daubert dukes employment class action european class action expert testimony expert witness FAA facebook foreign cubed fraud on the market frcp 23 global class action halliburton international class action International Class Action Law litigation funding parens patriae posner predominance privacy privacy class action removal rigorous analysis rule 23 scalia scotus securities class action securities fraud standing statistical evidence statistics Supreme Court tort reform transnational class action u.s. supreme court wal-mart
  • “Like” Us On Facebook

    ClassActionBlawg

    Promote Your Page Too

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: